基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译研究

VIP免费

3.0 陈辉 2024-11-19 4 4 688.5KB 74 页 15积分

侵权投诉

ABSTRACT

In view of the undue scanty investigation so far to quantitative analysis in

pragmatics, translating and translation, the Skopostheorie-based thesis ventures to

reconstruct the traditional Equivalence Theory and deconstruct the Pragmatic

Markedness Equivalence Principle, vintages of Nida and Hou Guojin respectively.

Dwelling upon the Skopostheorie, the author proposes an integrated revision: the

Skopostheorie-based Pragmatic Markedness Equivalence Principle, with empirical

expounding of the new model in terms of epistemological and methodological

significance. The author features the grafting, integrating and optimizing of the modes

from different backgrounds, hopefully contributing to the application of strategies for

translating and translation assessment, and ultimately to enriching and perfecting of the

inter-disciplinary construction of functionalist and pragmatic translation theories.

Originated from the Germany-based functionalist approach developed by

Katharina Reiss in the 1970s, Skopostheorie is fathered by Reiss’s action-theory-versed

disciple Hans Vermeer who lays the foundation stone by defining translation as a kind

of purposeful action. American biblical translator and translation theorist E. A. Nida

highlights the advocacy of “faithfulness” and “equivalence” and launches the concept of

Dynamic Equivalence later revised into Functional Equivalence. Vintage Nida is

transplanted by the Chinese scholar Hou Guojin to his Pragmatic Markedness

Hypothesis in his establishment of Pragmatic Markedness Equivalence Principle, a

quantitative approach highly feasible and instructive in describing and interpreting

translating and its assessment.

The research targets justifying and verifying of the Skopostheorie-based PMEP

designed for qualitative and quantitative criteria for translating guidance and translation

assessment. Specifically, the navigating introduction foregrounds the debates over

translation focuses, equivalence in particular, followed first by a critique of PMEP and

then its integrating with Skopostheorie —the Skopostheorie-based PMEP. In line with

the revised version, source texts and/or target texts of various genres manifesting

different contextual involvements are approached qualitatively and quantitatively from

the coordinated perspective of optimizing intercultural communicative translational

action via the manipulating of pragmatic markedness. The findings revealed by

pragmatic markedness equivalence argue that, ascribed to the global perspective-taking,

the Skopostheorie-based PMEP hereto manifests more convincingly interpretative

power and instructive value, hence contributing to the justifiability, feasibility and

instructiveness of this modification.

Key Words: Skopostheorie, Pragmatic Markedness, Equivalence

Translation, Grafting and Integrating

摘要

本文主要研究翻译过程的指导原则和译文评估的量化标准，旨在以功能学派

的目的论为观照，通过改造经典的等效论和侯国金博士提出的语用标记等效翻译

原则，建立、验证笔者提议的修正模型：基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译。

至今为止，国内外在语用学量化分析和对翻译过程(translating)、产品(translation)

及标准(criterion)进行定量表述方面的研究成果尚少，而以目的论(Skopostheorie)为

视角结合等效论(the Equivalence Theory)对翻译进行语用标记量化分析仍属空白，本

文以等效论为基础，借鉴、参照德国功能学派提出的目的论，以及我国学者侯国金

在经典标记理论基础上提出的语用标记等效原则(Pragmatic Markedness Equivalence

Principle, PMEP)，探询其理论创新性及局限性，阐释翻译目的对语用标记等效翻译

的影响，尝试提出、论证经笔者修正的理论模型：基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译

原则(Skopostheorie-Based PMEP)。本文以实证语料分析阐明了该模式在翻译行为中

的理论价值和指导意义，从而通过不同学科背景理论的移植、整合及优化达到增强

等效论、目的论和语用标记等效原则理论的解释力和适用性，以期对翻译的策略选

择和译文评估有所补充与完善，同时丰富、完善功能主义翻译理论和语用翻译理论

体系的跨学科建构。

目的论发轫于德国，该理论的雏形是凯塞林娜·赖斯(Katharina Reiss)于 20 世

纪 70 年代提出的功能翻译理论，其学生汉斯·威密尔(Hans Vermeer)摒弃了传统译

论中的原语中心论，从行为学的角度指出翻译是人类有目的的行为，创立了功能

派的奠基理论：翻译的目的论。等效论源自国内外学者对译文“忠实”、“等值”

的追求，美国圣经翻译家和翻译理论家 E. A. 奈达提出 “动态对等(Dynamic

Equivalence)”的概念，后来又发展为“功能对等(Functional Equivalence)”。奈达

的“对等论”作为“等效论”的最新代表，在全世界有着广泛的影响。本世纪初，

中国学者侯国金一方面创造性地把经典标记理论发展成为“语用标记价值论

(Pragmatic Markedness Hypothesis, PMH)”，另一方面把经典等效翻译理论发展成为

“语用标记等效翻译原则(PMEP)”，提出了一个具有较高可行性和操作性的翻译策

略及翻译评估模型，用于描述和解释翻译实践，通过量化的手段评估翻译和（平

行）翻译文本。

本文回顾了中外翻译史上对翻译核心问题及对等效论的争鸣，介绍了侯国金

vii

的语用标记等效翻译原则，引入功能学派的目的论并移植、整合至语用标记等效

翻译原则，提出了基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译原则。笔者以跨文化交际翻译

行为的效果最优化为导向，以语用标记值为策略和评估的切入点，对比分析了语

境参与程度不同的各种语类原文和（或）（平行）译文，从中寻求佳译在与其相应

源语语用标记等效方面的量化表征，证明了基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译原则

具有比其各个整合部分更强的解释力和指导意义，也验证了作者对涉及的三个理

论模型进行修正的合理性、可行性及可操作性。

关键词：目的论语用标记等效翻译移植整合

viii

A List of Abbreviations and Symbols

ST: source text

TT: target text

U: unmarked(ness)

M (M+, M++): marked(ness) [moderately marked(ness), strongly marked(ness)]

D/FEP: dynamic/functional equivalence principle

PM: pragmatic markedness

PMH: pragmatic markedness hypothesis

PME (P): pragmatic markedness equivalence (principle)

NEV: numerical equivalence value

SB: skopostheorie-based

L2:second language

A List of Tables

Table1: Pragmatic-Markedness Equivalence Model

Table2: Comparison of Calculations of Numerical Skopos-based PM Value

Table3: Skopostheorie-Based Pragmatic-Markedness Equivalence Model

CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ i

学位论文版权使用授权书 .............................................................................................. ii

声明 ............................................................................................................................. iii

ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................iv

摘要 ..............................................................................................................................vi

A List of Abbreviations and Symbols ......................................................................... viii

A List of Tables .............................................................................................................viii

Chapter One Translation and Pragmatics ....................................................................1

§1.1 Preliminary Remarks: A Retrospective Critique ................................................1

§1.2 Focuses of Translation Studies ...........................................................................2

§1.2.1 Translation Studies: Name and Nature .................................................... 4

§1.2.2 Intersubjectivity and Translation ..............................................................5

§1.2.3 Textual Peculiarity ................................................................................... 6

§1.2.4 Intertextuality and Translation ................................................................. 7

§1.3 Implications to Meaning .................................................................................... 8

§1.3.1 Semantic Study: Static Meaning .............................................................. 8

§1.3.2 Pragmatic Study: Dynamic Meaning ....................................................... 9

§1.4 Pragmatic Perspective on Translation .............................................................. 10

§1.5 Rationale and Layout of the Present Study ...................................................... 11

Chapter Two Pragmatic Markedness Equivalence: Hypothesis & Principle ..........13

§2.1 Review on the Markedness Theory ..................................................................13

§2.1.1 Criteria of Markedness ...........................................................................14

§2.1.2 Pragmatic Nature of Markedness ...........................................................16

§2.2 Review on the Pragmatic Markedness Hypothesis ..........................................19

§2.3 Theoretical Hypothesis of PMEP .....................................................................19

§2.3.1 Equivalence Revisited ............................................................................20

§2.3.2 Evaluation of PMEP .............................................................................. 21

§2.3.3 Limitations of PMEP ............................................................................. 23

§2.4 Relevant Pioneering Studies ............................................................................ 24

§2.4.1 Overseas Progress .................................................................................. 24

§2.4.2 Domestic Contention ............................................................................. 26

§2.4.3 A Critical Comment ............................................................................... 27

文档加载中……请稍候！
如果长时间未打开，您也可以点击刷新试试。

下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便

15 积分 4人已下载

立即下载 VIP免费下载

摘要：

ivABSTRACTInviewoftheunduescantyinvestigationsofartoquantitativeanalysisinpragmatics,translatingandtranslation,theSkopostheorie-basedthesisventurestoreconstructthetraditionalEquivalenceTheoryanddeconstructthePragmaticMarkednessEquivalencePrinciple,vintagesofNidaandHouGuojinrespectively.Dwellingupont...

展开>> 收起<<

基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译研究.pdf

共74页,预览8页

还剩页未读，继续阅读

基于目的论的语用标记等效翻译研究

相关推荐

开通VIP享超值会员特权

作者详情

相关内容

推荐作者

热门标签

举报选择: